| 
IF
the former Soviet Central Asian republics suffered from inferiority
complexes during the years of Russian cultural hegemony, their brash
leaders have gone to the opposite extreme since independence in
1991. Chief among them is Turkmenistan's President Saparmurat Niyazov,
whose bizarre personality cult makes him possibly the only world
leader alongside whom North Korea's President Kim Jong Il appears
modest.
Niyazov
was of relatively humble origins, being orphaned by a massive earthquake
that struck the capital Ashkhabad in 1948. Ashkhabad was used as
a military outpost by the Russian Tsars to govern the Turkmen desert
tribes they conquered in the mid-19th century, and became capital
of the new Turkmen republic created by the Bolshevik regime in 1924.
When
the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 Niyazov, who had risen through
Communist Party ranks to head the republic in 1985, transformed
his new state into a pseudo-tribal polity centred on himself. He
adopted the name 'Turkmenbashi', meaning 'leader of the Turkmen'.
His face adorns everything from the currency to bottles of vodka;
his portrait hangs in offices, schools and on street corners; Ashkhabad's
central boulevard and its airport are both named after him. Uniformed
guards stand beside statues of him that litter the capital, one
of them a gold Turkmenbashi that rotates with the sun. He has even
renamed the month of January 'Turkmenbashi' - and April is now known
as Gurbansoltan, after his mother.
Yet
Niyazov's iron-fisted rule is no laughing matter. The Organization
for Security and Co-operation in Europe reckons the Turkmen Government's
restrictions on freedom of expression to be the worst in any of
its 55 member states. There are no independent media, opposition
parties nor trade unions. The import of foreign newspapers is strictly
forbidden and internet access tightly controlled. Members of minority
religions have been harassed, imprisoned and even deported.
Niyazov's
zeal to insulate his country from the outside world has led him
to ban opera and ballet and close concert halls, the circus and
the Academy of Sciences. They have been replaced instead by Niyazov's
notion of Turkmen culture, centring upon the Ruhnama, his
book of spiritual sayings. This has all been justified in the name
of 'stability' - and it is true that the country has thus far avoided
the destruction that engulfed neighbouring Tajikistan.
Yet
even these measures have not been enough to insulate Niyazov from
all opposition. There was a major assassination attempt on him in
Ashkhabad in November 2002, and street protests have been more frequent.
Although small in number, these suggest that the population may
be increasingly unprepared to accept their lot. The majority of
the population live below the poverty line, with conditions particularly
bad in rural areas. Turkmens witnessed steep declines in wages and
in health, education and other public-service provision, following
the collapse of the Soviet Union. Many feel that they are not getting
a fair share of the state's wealth.
And
wealth it has in plenty: Turkmenistan's deserts and Caspian seabed
boast copious oil deposits and one of the world's largest reserves
of natural gas. Recent increases in production, as Turkmenistan
opens more export routes, have led to double-figure GDP growth over
the past few years. These returns allow Niyazov to bolster his own
rule and subsidize basic foodstuffs so as to cushion the effects
of poverty in a way that neighbouring states cannot do.
This
hydrocarbon wealth means foreign governments and oil companies are
eager to curry favour with Turkmenistan. And its official neutrality
did not prevent Niyazov from allowing American military planes to
use Turkmen airspace in their war with the Taliban. As a reward
for this support, the US State Department refused to include Turkmenistan
in its 2002 list of 'Countries of Particular Concern' over the infringement
of religious liberties, even though it has the worst record on religious
freedom in the former Soviet Union. Inclusion would have incurred
automatic sanctions. On the contrary, Donald Rumsfeld personally
flew to Ashkhabad to thank Niyazov for his support.
This
combination of luck, skill and hydrocarbons may ensure that Niyazov
remains in power for some time yet. Perhaps there is something to
the Ruhnama after all.
Nick
Megoran

|
|
Leader:
President-for-life Saparmurat Niyazov.
Economy:
Gross national income (GNI) per person $990 (Kazakhstan $1,360,
United States $34,870).
Monetary
unit:
Manat.
Main
exports:
Natural gas and cotton. Gas exports have traditionally gone
via Russia but that route has often been blockaded since 1997,
severely hampering the economy.
People:
4.8 million. People per square kilometre 10 (Britain 238).
Health:
Infant mortality 76 per 1,000 live births (Kazakhstan 61,
United States 7). Public health services have been significantly
cut since the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Environment:
90 per cent of the country is sandy plain. The Kara-Kum Canal
diverts the waters of the Amu Darya to irrigate the Ashkhabad
and Mary areas.
Culture:
Turkmenis 77%; Uzbeks 9%; Russians 7%; Kazakhs 2%; others
5%. Religion: Sunni Muslim 87%; Russian Orthodox 6%; others
7%.
Language:
Turkmen (official) and Russian.
Sources:
World Guide 2003/2004; State of the World's Children 2003;
worldinformation.com
Never
previously profiled

LITERACY
   
Near universal literacy persists as a
Soviet legacy, although the higher-education system
has been substantially downgraded in a policy of cultural
purification. |
 |
FREEDOM

Turkmenistan is more restrictive of civil liberties
than any other state in the former Soviet Union. |
 |
LIFE
EXPECTANCY    
67 years
(Kazakhstan 65, United States 77). |
 |
|
| 
NI
Assessment 
Turkmenistan has abandoned any pretence that it is a democracy.
Stability has been maintained by a President who has fostered
a personality cult that more resembles a burlesque of post-colonial
petty dictatorship than it does the brutal Stalinism with
which it is sometimes compared. Nonetheless, a growing number
of disaffected former allies and demoted officials pose an
increasingly organized opposition in exile. |
|